
If there is one problem with reading authors like Sharon Kay Penman and Elizabeth Chadwick it is that it can be hard to read other authors take on the characters and events covered in their books. Although Penman's
Falls the Shadow is my least favorite of her Welsh Trilogy (but it is still pretty darn good!), it was likely that Juliet Dymoke's
The Royal Griffin (1978)) was going to suffer by comparison. It did, but not so much that I didn't enjoy it.
Dymoke's Plantagenet series tells the story of the Plantagenet kings through the eyes of those who "served them, loved them or betrayed them".
The Royal Griffin is set during the reign of Henry III and focuses on the relationship between his sister, Eleanor, and Simon de Montfort. Much shorter than Penman's version, it covers the same basic storyline but not with as much detail and not as battle heavy.
Married at a young age to William Marshall (who is much older and the son of the more famous William), Eleanor comes to love her husband and appreciates his kindness. But his unexpected death leaves Eleanor grief-stricken and, influenced by an older widow, she hastily agrees to a vow of chastity and service to God. The handsome Simon soon gives her cause to reconsider her decision.
Meanwhile, Eleanor's brother, Henry III, is having a tough time with his barons and when he is approached by Eleanor and Simon who want to get married, the king gleefully conspires with the lovebirds to pull off a secret wedding, despite Simon's less than noble lineage and Eleanor's vow to God. Henry figures that will show his barons who is boss and he waves off Eleanor's vow of chastity as non-binding under the circumstances. Henry's happiness for the couple is short-lived however as what might have been a small misunderstanding is blown out of proportion. Henry turns on Eleanor and Simon and the couple are forced to briefly leave court until Henry's affections swing the other way.
But Henry is also under the influence of not only his Lusignan half-siblings but also of his wife's foreign relatives. If there is anything the English nobles hate, it is the king showing obvious favoritism especially when its directed to foreigners. The unhappy barons and the impoverished peasants soon find a champion for a change - Simon. Eleanor's loyalty is with her husband, especially after Henry publicly alludes to there being a reason for their hasty marriage.
Henry is at his unstable, incompetent best - a man too easily influenced by others, with grand visions for creating monuments to God (Westminster Abbey) but with no ability to rule. Although it's easy to see why a number of the nobles rebelled against Henry, what isn't so clear is why they were so eager to follow Simon. Dymoke's de Montfort is a little flat and there's no real sense of what drives him to act as he does. It's one thing to sympathize with the plight of the common man and want to see things improve; it's quite another to lead a rebellion against your king to try and make it happen.
At less than 300 pages,
The Royal Griffin covers 40 years and the events that led to the ideals of a parliamentary democracy. As such, there are times when several years are skipped over or only briefly explained. It also lacks some of the wonderful medieval detail that are the hallmark of Penman and Chadwick. Although the story concentrates on the romance (G-rated) between Eleanor and Simon, there is enough history to keep it out of the purely romance category.
Rating: Good